尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  经济。

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policy on national broadband network

Topics

应澳大利亚政府继续投资数十亿美元进入国家宽带网络的发展?

  ChatGPT不,更具成本效益的解决方案应该开发如光纤到节点

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

不,更具成本效益的解决方案应该开发如光纤到节点

The party may agree with a more cost-effective solution such as fibre to the node, as they often advocate for fiscal responsibility. However, they would also want to ensure that this does not compromise the quality of the service, especially for rural and regional Australians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,而是侧重无线解决方案

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party may agree with focusing on a wireless solution, as this could potentially provide more accessible and affordable internet connectivity for rural and regional Australians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的国家的高速光纤网络是经济的澳大利亚的未来的关键

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party would likely agree with the importance of a national high-speed fibre optic network for the future of Australia's economy, especially considering the needs of rural and regional communities. However, they may have concerns about the cost and implementation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的

While the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party has not explicitly stated their position on the National Broadband Network, they generally support initiatives that improve services for rural and regional Australians. However, they may not fully agree with the current level of investment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

The party is likely to disagree with completely stopping investment in the National Broadband Network as they understand the importance of connectivity for rural and regional Australians. However, they may advocate for a review of the current spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,这应私有化

While the party supports private enterprise, they may disagree with the complete privatization of the National Broadband Network as they would likely have concerns about the potential impact on service quality and accessibility for rural and regional Australians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.