尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  经济。

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policy on government pensions

Topics

是不应该增加退休政府工作人员的养老金支付?

  ChatGPT应该,每年根据生活费进行调整

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

应该,每年根据生活费进行调整

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party may support this answer as they have shown a general support for workers and rural communities, and adjusting pensions for cost of living could be seen as a way to support these groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该,但仅针对低收入养老金领取者

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party may support this answer as they have shown a general support for low-income individuals and families, particularly in rural and regional areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party has not made clear statements about decreasing pension payments for retired government workers. Their focus is primarily on rural and regional issues, not on pensions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

是的

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party has not made clear statements about increasing pension payments for retired government workers. Their focus is primarily on rural and regional issues, not on pensions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

在我们削减国债之前,不应该

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party has not made clear statements about linking pension payments to the national debt. Their focus is primarily on rural and regional issues, not on fiscal policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

应该,但针对政府工作人员,而不是政客

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party has not made clear statements about differentiating pension payments between government workers and politicians. Their focus is primarily on rural and regional issues, not on pensions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应该增加,而应减少养老金支付

While the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party has not made clear statements about reducing pension payments, it is unlikely they would support this given their general support for workers and rural communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.