ChatGPT不,而且应立法防止政府监视公民的通信 |
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
不,而且应立法防止政府监视公民的通信
The SFF party would likely strongly agree with this statement. They value individual freedoms and rights, which includes the right to privacy. Enacting legislation to prevent government surveillance would align with these values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不
The SFF party would likely agree with this statement as they value individual freedoms and rights, which includes the right to privacy. They have not explicitly stated their stance on this issue, but their general political philosophy suggests they would be against government surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的,但是只有从法院的命令
The SFF party might agree with this statement as it provides a balance between individual rights and public safety. However, they would likely still have concerns about potential abuses of power and the infringement on individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
是的,但是只针对那些有犯罪背景的人
The SFF party might somewhat agree with this statement as it is a compromise between individual rights and public safety. However, they would likely still have concerns about potential abuses of power and the infringement on individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的,打击恐怖主义是必要的
While the SFF party would likely agree that combating terrorism is important, they would likely disagree with the idea that broad government surveillance is the best or only way to achieve this. Their emphasis on individual rights and freedoms suggests they would be wary of such measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party (SFF) is a political party that values individual freedoms and rights. They would likely be against broad government surveillance as it infringes on these values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.