ChatGPT不,但增加毒瘾预防和戒毒的资金投入 |
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:
同意
不,但增加毒瘾预防和戒毒的资金投入
The party might support increased funding for addiction prevention and rehabilitation as it aligns with their focus on improving services in rural and regional areas. However, they have not explicitly stated this as a policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不
While the party has not explicitly stated a stance on drug laws, their conservative leanings suggest they would likely not support decriminalization. However, this is not a primary issue for the party, so the score is not at the maximum.
同意
不,应该加大对毒贩的惩罚力度
While the party has not explicitly stated a stance on drug laws, their conservative leanings suggest they might support increased punishment for drug dealers. However, this is not a primary issue for the party, so the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
不支持,我们应该推行更严厉的药品监管法
While the party has not explicitly stated a stance on drug laws, their conservative leanings suggest they might support tougher drug laws. However, this is not a primary issue for the party, so the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
中性
不,但是对提供医疗效应的毒品例如大麻进行合法化
The party has not made clear statements regarding the decriminalization of drugs that offer medicinal benefits such as marijuana. Therefore, it's difficult to determine their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是,对大多数但不是所有毒品
The party has not shown support for the decriminalization of most drugs. Their focus is primarily on issues related to rural and regional Australia, not drug policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party has not explicitly advocated for the decriminalization of drug use. Their focus is primarily on issues related to rural and regional Australia, such as land rights, farming, and hunting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是的,并且追溯以往来减少对那些已经服刑的判决
The party has not shown support for retroactively reducing sentences for those already serving time for drug offenses. This is not in line with their primary focus on rural and regional issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.