尝试政治测验

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policy on drug trafficking penalties

Topics

贩毒分子是否应该受到死刑?

  ChatGPT不应该,我不认为有死刑的必要

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

不应该,我不认为有死刑的必要

Australia abolished the death penalty in 1973 and there is broad political consensus against its reintroduction. The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not indicated any desire to change this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

While the party has not explicitly stated their stance on this issue, it is likely they would lean towards disagreeing with the death penalty for drug traffickers, given the general political climate in Australia which is largely against the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不应该,判处他们终身监禁,且不得假释

While the party has not explicitly stated their stance on this issue, it is likely they would lean towards agreeing with life imprisonment without parole for drug traffickers, given their general stance on law and order issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

应该,只要他们受到的是公正的审判

While the party would likely agree with the concept of a fair trial, they have not advocated for the death penalty, even with a fair trial. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

应该,但前提必须是他们是再犯

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not indicated support for the death penalty, even for repeated offenders. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

应该,但前提必须是有证据证明有人死于他们贩运的毒品。

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not indicated support for the death penalty, even in cases where there is proof someone died from the drugs trafficked. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not explicitly advocated for the death penalty for drug traffickers. Their focus is more on rural issues and rights for hunters, fishers, and farmers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 21hrs ago

Party’s support base

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不应该,判处他们终身监禁,且不得假释

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 725 voters that identify as Shooters, Fishers and Farmers.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.