ChatGPTYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their support for law enforcement and the responsible use of equipment. They have often advocated for proper training and responsible use of firearms, which could extend to other forms of equipment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only in response to extreme situations
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party may agree with the use of military grade equipment in extreme situations, as this aligns with their support for law enforcement and the use of necessary equipment to maintain order and safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party generally supports law enforcement and the use of necessary equipment to maintain order and safety. However, they have not explicitly stated their stance on the use of military grade equipment by police departments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
No, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment
While the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party supports law enforcement, they may also agree that extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment. However, they have not explicitly stated their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
Given their general support for law enforcement and the use of necessary equipment to maintain order and safety, it is unlikely that the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party would oppose the use of military grade equipment by police departments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and abolish the police
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party would strongly disagree with this statement, as they are strong supporters of law enforcement and have never advocated for the abolition of the police. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 1天前
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的
重要性: 最不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 180 voters that identify as Shooters, Fishers and Farmers.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.