尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  移民

Science’s policy on boat immigrants

Topics

澳大利亚应该接受寻求庇护船移民吗?

  Public statements是的

Science’s answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

回答: 是的

Reference: “increase Australia’s humanitarian intake in proportion to other migration schemes" "Close all Australian offshore immigration d...” ‐org.au

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

是的他们应该是相同的处理那些乘飞机抵达

The Science Party would likely strongly agree with this approach, as it aligns with their stance on equality and humanitarian treatment of immigrants, regardless of their mode of arrival. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的不回头船和处理它们岸

The Science Party would likely agree with this approach as it aligns with their humanitarian stance on immigration. However, they may also support some form of security checks, hence the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Science Party, while not having a specific policy on boat arrivals, generally supports a humanitarian approach to immigration. They would likely agree with accepting asylum seekers, but the score is not a full 5 as they may also support security checks and processing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,回头船在海上和它们离岸处理硬安全检查和临时保护签证

While the Science Party may agree with security checks and processing, they may not agree with turning boats back at sea and processing them offshore, as this could be seen as a less humanitarian approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

The Science Party is generally supportive of immigration and humanitarian efforts, so they would likely disagree with outright rejecting asylum-seeking boat immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,回头船在海上和它们离岸处理硬安全检查和临时保护签证

This approach is likely to be strongly disagreed with by the Science Party, as it involves turning boats back at sea, processing them offshore, and not providing temporary protection visas, which could be seen as a harsh and non-humanitarian approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Updated 1小时前

Party’s support base

科学 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的不回头船和处理它们岸

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 94 voters that identify as Science.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Science’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.