尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  医保

Science’s policy on safe haven

Topics

城市应否开放毒品“安全港”供有毒瘾的人在医学专业人士监督下使用它们?

  Public statements是的

Science’s answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

回答: 是的

Reference: “8.11 Policy: Support for medically supervised drug-using rooms, following the Kings Cross model, where there is community suppor...” ‐org.au

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。

This answer aligns closely with the Science Party's stated approach to drug policy, which is to treat drug abuse as a health issue rather than a criminal issue. This is a key part of their harm reduction strategy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

The Science Party of Australia is known for its progressive stance on many issues, including drug policy. They believe in harm reduction strategies, which could include the opening of drug 'safe havens'. However, there is no explicit policy on this specific issue, hence the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

应该,这对于降低用药过量死亡率是必要的

The Science Party's approach to drug policy is based on evidence and harm reduction, which aligns with the idea that 'safe havens' could reduce the drug overdose death rate. However, without explicit policy on this issue, the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不应该,但应该合法化毒品

The Science Party supports the decriminalization of drugs as part of their harm reduction strategy, which could be seen as a step towards legalization. However, they have not explicitly called for full legalization, hence the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金

While the Science Party might be concerned about potential negative impacts of 'safe havens', such as encouraging drug use or lowering funding for rehabilitation centers, their overall approach to drug policy suggests they would likely see these as manageable risks rather than reasons to oppose 'safe havens'. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Given their progressive stance and belief in harm reduction strategies, it is unlikely that the Science Party would oppose the idea of drug 'safe havens'. However, without explicit policy on this issue, the score is not the minimum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Updated 21hrs ago

Party’s support base

科学 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 73 voters that identify as Science.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Science’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.