The Science Party believes that technological development is a positive force in human affairs and values the cultural,…
Public statements是的 |
Science’s answer is based on the following data:
回答: 是的
Reference: “The Science Party welcomes and supports recent moves by the Federal government to fund early intervention services for people su...” ‐org.au
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
应该，我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务
The Australian Science Party would likely strongly agree with this statement as it aligns with their general stance on the importance of scientific research and the need for adequate funding, particularly in areas that directly impact public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
是的
The Australian Science Party strongly supports the advancement of scientific research, including mental health. However, their specific stance on funding allocation is not explicitly stated, hence the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
应该，但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金，而不是资助制药公司
The Australian Science Party would likely agree with this statement to some extent as it emphasizes the importance of personalized care in mental health treatment. However, they also recognize the role of pharmaceutical companies in healthcare, hence the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不应该，而是应该鼓励私营公司来解决这一问题
While the Australian Science Party supports innovation and the role of private companies in scientific advancement, they also recognize the importance of government funding in research and healthcare. Therefore, they would likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不
The Australian Science Party is unlikely to agree with this statement as they generally support increased funding for scientific research, including mental health. However, without specific policy details, the score is not the minimum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Science’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
