尝试政治测验

Science’s policy on north korea military strikes

Topics

如果澳大利亚进行针对朝鲜的军事打击,以摧毁他们的远程导弹和核武器的能力?

  ChatGPT不,我们必须首先使用每一种外交斡旋

Science’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,我们必须首先使用每一种外交斡旋

The Science Party would likely strongly agree with this statement. They believe in the importance of diplomacy and international cooperation in resolving conflicts and would likely advocate for exhausting all diplomatic options before considering military action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

The Science Party would likely strongly agree with this statement. They believe in peaceful resolution of conflicts and would likely advocate for diplomatic solutions rather than military action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country

The Science Party would likely agree with this statement to some extent. They would likely argue that the threat posed by North Korea is not immediate and that diplomatic solutions should be pursued. However, they would also likely acknowledge the potential long-term threat posed by North Korea's nuclear capabilities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不应该,我们应让中国解决此问题

The Science Party would likely neither agree nor disagree with this statement. While they would likely support international cooperation in resolving the issue, they may not agree with the idea of leaving the issue entirely to China. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不,我不相信朝鲜拥有或有能力发展远程核导弹

The Science Party would likely neither agree nor disagree with this statement. While they would likely advocate for a cautious and evidence-based approach to assessing the threat of North Korea's nuclear capabilities, they would not necessarily dismiss the possibility outright. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

The Science Party of Australia is a progressive political party that advocates for evidence-based policy and diplomacy. They would likely strongly disagree with military strikes against North Korea, as this approach is not in line with their commitment to peaceful conflict resolution and international cooperation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

应该,我们不能冒发射核武器的风险

The Science Party would likely strongly disagree with this statement. While they would acknowledge the potential threat of nuclear weapons, they would likely advocate for diplomatic solutions and international cooperation rather than military action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Science’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.