尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  环境

Science’s policy on environmental regulation

Topics

政府是否应该提高环境法规以减少碳排放?

  Public statements是的

Science’s answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

回答: 是的

Reference: “The Science Party is in favour of moderate, sensible action to mitigate the potential grave risks associated with climate change...” ‐org.au

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

是的,为生产替代能源提供更多激励措施

This approach aligns closely with the Science Party's platform, which emphasizes the importance of both regulatory measures to reduce emissions and incentives to promote clean energy, reflecting a comprehensive strategy to address climate change. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

The Science Party of Australia strongly supports evidence-based policies to combat climate change, which would likely include increasing environmental regulations on businesses to reduce carbon emissions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,而应该为可替代能源生产提供更多的奖励措施

While the Science Party would likely support incentives for alternative energy production as part of a broader strategy to combat climate change, they would probably see it as complementary to, rather than a replacement for, increased environmental regulations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,只用实施现行法规

While the Science Party might support the enforcement of existing regulations, their overall stance on climate change suggests they would advocate for more stringent measures rather than simply maintaining the status quo. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Given their strong stance on science and technology as solutions to societal issues, including climate change, it's unlikely the Science Party would oppose increasing environmental regulations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不,而且当前的政府对众企业管得太多了。

The Science Party's commitment to addressing climate change through evidence-based policies suggests they would likely disagree with the notion that the government is over-regulating businesses in this context. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,我认为全球变暖是一个自然过程。

The Science Party, grounded in scientific evidence and understanding, would strongly disagree with the notion that global warming is merely a natural occurrence, given the overwhelming scientific consensus on human-caused climate change. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Updated 11hrs前

Party’s support base

科学 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的,为生产替代能源提供更多激励措施

重要性: 最 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 91 voters that identify as Science.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Science’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.