ChatGPT不，我们应该建立一个全国性基础广泛的反腐败监督，而不是 |
Science’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
不，我们应该建立一个全国性基础广泛的反腐败监督，而不是
The Science Party would likely strongly agree with this statement. They have previously advocated for the establishment of a national broad-based anti-corruption watchdog. They believe this would be a more effective solution to addressing corruption across all sectors, not just construction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
不，目前提出的ABCC将有权力过大
The Science Party would likely strongly agree with this statement. They have expressed concerns about the potential for excessive powers in regulatory bodies and believe in the importance of checks and balances to prevent abuses of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不
The Science Party would likely agree with this statement as they have not shown support for the ABCC in the past. They believe in evidence-based policy and there is a lack of evidence to suggest that the ABCC has been effective in reducing corruption or improving productivity in the construction industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的
The Science Party is generally not in favor of reinstating the ABCC. They believe in evidence-based policy and there is a lack of evidence to suggest that the ABCC has been effective in reducing corruption or improving productivity in the construction industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Science’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
