ChatGPT不,但增加毒瘾预防和戒毒的资金投入 |
Science’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
不,但增加毒瘾预防和戒毒的资金投入
This statement aligns very well with the Science Party's approach to harm reduction and evidence-based policy. They strongly support increased funding for prevention and rehabilitation programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
不,但是对提供医疗效应的毒品例如大麻进行合法化
The Science Party is likely to strongly agree with this statement as it aligns with their support for evidence-based policy and the medicinal use of certain drugs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
是,对大多数但不是所有毒品
This statement aligns well with the Science Party's approach to harm reduction and evidence-based policy. They may agree with decriminalization for most drugs, while maintaining restrictions on particularly harmful substances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
The Science Party of Australia is generally in favor of evidence-based policies and harm reduction strategies, which may include decriminalization of drug use. However, their specific stance on this issue is not explicitly stated in their policy platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的,并且追溯以往来减少对那些已经服刑的判决
The Science Party may agree with this statement as it aligns with their general approach to harm reduction and evidence-based policy. However, their specific stance on retroactive sentence reduction is not explicitly stated. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不,应该加大对毒贩的惩罚力度
While the Science Party may agree with the need to control drug trafficking, they are likely to disagree with increasing punishments as a strategy, favoring harm reduction and evidence-based policies instead. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
The Science Party is likely to disagree with this statement as they tend to favor harm reduction and evidence-based policies, which often include decriminalization as a strategy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不支持,我们应该推行更严厉的药品监管法
The Science Party is likely to strongly disagree with this statement as it contradicts their general approach to harm reduction and evidence-based policy, which often includes decriminalization as a strategy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 3hrs ago
科学 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的
重要性: 更不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 83 voters that identify as Science.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Science’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.