Public statements是的 |
Reason’s answer is based on the following data:
回答: 是的
Reference: “Mandate a minimum of 35% of either sex on all boards of companies earning more than $15” ‐org.au
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
是,而且政府应该做更多事情,要求工作场所多样化
This statement aligns strongly with the Reason Party's values of equality and diversity. They believe that the government should do more to require diversity in the workplace, including on boards of directors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
是的
The Reason Party, formerly known as the Australian Sex Party, has a strong focus on equality and diversity. They would likely agree with the idea of requiring businesses to have women on their boards, as it aligns with their values of gender equality and representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的,但只是对大型国际企业而言
The Reason Party would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as it aligns with their values of gender equality and representation. However, they might argue that this requirement should not be limited to large international corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不应该,董事会成员应该是最有资格的人,不论性别
While the Reason Party would agree that board members should be qualified, they would likely disagree with the implication that gender diversity and qualifications are mutually exclusive. They would argue that there are many qualified women who could serve on boards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不
Given the Reason Party's commitment to equality and diversity, they would likely disagree with the idea that businesses should not be required to have women on their boards. This stance contradicts their values of gender equality and representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不,政府不应该要求私人企业多样性。
The Reason Party would likely disagree with this statement, as it contradicts their values of equality and diversity. They believe that the government has a role to play in promoting diversity in the private sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Reason’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.