尝试政治测验

Reason’s policy on euthanasia

Topics

应该允许处于疾病末期的病人通过协助自杀结束自己的生命吗?

  Public statements是的

Reason’s answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

回答: 是的

Reference: “Repeal laws that prevent the territories from enacting voluntary assisted dying legislatio” ‐org.au

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

是的

The Reason Party strongly supports the right to die with dignity. They have consistently advocated for voluntary assisted dying laws, as evidenced by their support for the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2017 in Victoria, Australia. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以

The Reason Party would strongly agree with this statement. They believe in the right to die with dignity, but also recognize the importance of safeguards, such as psychological examinations, to ensure that the decision is fully understood and voluntary. This is reflected in their support for the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2017, which includes similar safeguards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是,但前提是他们已经没有任何战胜病魔的可能

The Reason Party would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their support for voluntary assisted dying laws. However, the condition of 'no chance of survival' might be seen as too restrictive, as they believe in the right to die with dignity for those suffering from a terminal illness, regardless of the prognosis. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,但应该允许这些患者拒绝接受人工急救

While the Reason Party would agree that patients should be allowed to refuse artificial life support, this answer does not fully align with their stance as it does not include the right to assisted suicide, which they strongly support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

The Reason Party is strongly against the idea that terminally ill patients should not be allowed to end their lives via assisted suicide. Their stance is based on the belief in individual autonomy and the right to die with dignity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Reason’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.