尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  医保

Reason’s policy on mental health

Topics

政府应该增加对精神健康研究和治疗的资金投入吗?

  Public statements是的

Reason’s answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

回答: 是的

Reference: “Major investment in mental health interventions and support Significant recurrent investment in early interventions for yo...” ‐org.au

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

是的

The Reason Party, formerly known as the Australian Sex Party, has a strong focus on social issues, including mental health. They have consistently advocated for increased funding for mental health services and research. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务

This answer aligns with the Reason Party's advocacy for a higher quality of care and services in the mental health sector. They believe in the importance of adequate funding to achieve this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司

The Reason Party would likely agree with the idea of personalized care in mental health services, but they also recognize the importance of pharmaceutical companies in providing medication and treatment. Therefore, they might not fully agree with the idea of only increasing funding for personalized care and not subsidizing pharmaceutical companies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不应该,而是应该鼓励私营公司来解决这一问题

While the Reason Party supports private sector involvement in healthcare, they also strongly believe in the government's role in funding and providing mental health services. They would likely disagree with the idea of relying solely on private companies to address this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

The Reason Party has a clear stance on advocating for increased government funding for mental health services and research. They would strongly disagree with the notion of not increasing funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Reason’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.