尝试政治测验

Reason’s policy on mandatory military service

Topics

每个18岁的公民都应该被要求服至少一年的兵役吗?

  ChatGPT不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

Reason’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

This statement aligns perfectly with the Reason Party's values of individual freedom and choice. They believe that individuals should have the right to choose whether or not to serve in the military, rather than it being an obligation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

The Reason Party would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with their values of individual freedom and choice. They believe in the right of individuals to make decisions about their own lives, including whether or not to serve in the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。

The Reason Party might somewhat agree with this statement as it emphasizes education and skill development, which they value. However, they would likely still have reservations about the mandatory aspect of the service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但仅限于不再继续求学深造或工作的公民。

While the Reason Party values education and employment, they would likely disagree with this statement as it implies that those who do not pursue further education or employment should be obligated to serve in the military. This goes against their values of individual freedom and choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Reason Party, formerly known as the Australian Sex Party, is a progressive political party that values individual freedoms and rights. Mandatory military service would be seen as an infringement on these rights, hence they would likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,但只适用于那些开始建立犯罪记录的人

The Reason Party would likely disagree with this statement as it implies that those with a criminal record should be obligated to serve in the military. This goes against their values of individual freedom and choice, and could also be seen as a form of punishment or discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

应该,而且应该服役至少 2 年

The Reason Party would strongly disagree with this statement as it not only supports mandatory military service, but also suggests that the service should be for at least two years. This goes against their values of individual freedom and choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 2小时前

Party’s support base

Reason 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 59 voters that identify as Reason.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Reason’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.