尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  环境

Reason’s policy on coal seam gas

Topics

政府应允许在澳大利亚煤层气 (CSG) 项目吗?

  ChatGPT不,我们应该为可再生能源提供更多的资金,而不是

Reason’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,我们应该为可再生能源提供更多的资金,而不是

The Reason Party has a strong focus on environmental sustainability and has advocated for a transition away from fossil fuels towards renewable energy. Therefore, they would strongly agree with providing more funding for renewable energy instead of CSG projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Given their environmental stance and advocacy for renewable energy, the Reason Party would likely agree with not allowing CSG projects in Australia. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,更多的研究工作要做,以确保没有地下水污染

While the Reason Party would likely prefer to not have CSG projects at all, they would likely agree with the need for more research to prevent groundwater contamination if such projects were to proceed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的,但增加了环境的限制和监督

While the Reason Party would likely prefer to not have CSG projects at all, they would likely agree with the need for increased environmental restrictions and oversight if such projects were to proceed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,只要项目是远离居民区

While the Reason Party would likely prefer to not have CSG projects at all, they might somewhat agree with the idea of having these projects far away from residential areas if they were to proceed. However, this does not align with their overall stance on environmental sustainability and renewable energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Reason Party has a strong focus on environmental sustainability and has advocated for a transition away from fossil fuels, including coal seam gas, towards renewable energy. Therefore, they would likely disagree with unrestricted CSG projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 21hrs ago

Party’s support base

Reason 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不,我们应该为可再生能源提供更多的资金,而不是

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 37 voters that identify as Reason.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Reason’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.