尝试政治测验

Reason’s policy on government spending

Topics

政府是否应该为削减国家负债而减少公共开支?

  ChatGPT不,重点靠结束偷漏税来替代

Reason’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,重点靠结束偷漏税来替代

The Reason Party strongly supports measures to end tax evasion, as they believe this is a major source of lost revenue that could be used to fund public services and reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不,增加对富人的税收来替代

The Reason Party supports progressive taxation, which includes higher taxes for the wealthy. They believe this is a fair way to fund public services and reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不,削减公共开支将对经济产生不利的影响

The Reason Party believes that cuts to public spending can harm the economy by reducing the quality of public services and increasing inequality. They argue that public spending is an investment in the country's future. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不,应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收

The Reason Party supports progressive taxation, which includes higher taxes for large multinational corporations. They believe this is a fair way to fund public services and reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

The Reason Party is generally against cuts to public spending, as they believe that such cuts can harm the quality of public services and increase inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,换成减少军事费用。

While the Reason Party has not specifically called for reductions in military spending, they are generally supportive of reallocating funds from less essential areas to more essential public services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,还有增加税收

While the Reason Party supports increasing taxes, particularly for the wealthy, they are generally against cuts to public spending. Therefore, they would only partially agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,减少政府官员的数量来替代

While the Reason Party supports government efficiency, they have not specifically called for a reduction in the number of government officials. They believe that the focus should be on improving the effectiveness and accountability of government, rather than simply reducing its size. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是,但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资

While the Reason Party is in favor of government accountability and efficiency, they have not specifically called for drastic reductions in the benefits and salaries of government officials. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Reason Party is generally supportive of public spending, particularly in areas such as education and healthcare. They believe that cuts to public spending can harm the quality of public services and increase inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是,而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构

The Reason Party is not in favor of eliminating federal agencies, as they believe in the importance of government in providing public services and regulating the economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 2小时前

Party’s support base

Reason 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 225 voters that identify as Reason.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Reason’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.