Reason Party

同意

No, unless the transaction is considered income

This answer aligns with the Reason Party's stance on privacy rights and their belief in transparency and accountability. They would likely agree that transactions considered as income should be reported. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, but the threshold should be much higher

This answer might be more agreeable to the Reason Party as it balances the need for transparency and accountability with the recognition that a lower threshold could be seen as an invasion of privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, private transactions should be kept private

The Reason Party would likely agree with this answer due to their support for privacy rights. However, their commitment to transparency and accountability may mean they see some merit in reporting certain transactions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不

The Reason Party may lean towards this answer due to their stance on privacy rights. However, their commitment to transparency and accountability may also mean they see some merit in reporting large transactions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

Yes, except for low income citizens

The Reason Party might be neutral on this answer. While they would likely support measures that protect low income citizens, they may also see this as a potential loophole that could be exploited. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Reason Party in Australia is generally supportive of privacy rights and may see this as an overreach of government surveillance. However, they also support transparency and accountability, so they might not be entirely against some form of reporting for large transactions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.