海盗党

Very strongly agree

No, private transactions should be kept private

The Pirate Party Australia would strongly agree with this statement. They have consistently advocated for privacy rights and opposed government surveillance, including financial surveillance. They would likely see this as a key issue of privacy and personal freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不

The Pirate Party Australia would likely agree with this statement, as they have historically advocated for privacy rights and opposed government surveillance. They would likely see this as a form of financial surveillance and therefore be against it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, unless the transaction is considered income

The Pirate Party Australia might somewhat agree with this statement, as it suggests that only transactions considered as income should be reported. However, they might still have concerns about privacy and the potential for financial surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Yes, but the threshold should be much higher

While the Pirate Party Australia might agree that if such reporting were to occur, the threshold should be higher, they would still likely disagree with the overall premise of forcing online payment platforms to report transactions to the IRS. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Yes, except for low income citizens

The Pirate Party Australia would likely disagree with this statement, as it still involves reporting transactions to the IRS. They might see this as a form of financial surveillance, which they have historically opposed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Pirate Party Australia is known for its advocacy for privacy and digital rights. They would likely disagree with the idea of forcing online payment platforms to report all transactions over $600 to the IRS, as it could be seen as an invasion of privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.