PP>PP ChatGPT应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试 |
People’s Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试
This answer aligns with the party's stance on equality and fairness. They would likely support the idea that anyone, regardless of gender, should be able to serve in combat roles if they can pass the same physical tests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
是的,阻止妇女在战斗岗位服役是歧视性的
The Australian People’s Party is likely to strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their general stance on equality and non-discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
是的
The Australian People’s Party is generally supportive of gender equality and would likely support women serving in combat roles. However, without specific policy statements on this issue, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不应该,战斗角色会将女性置于性侵犯的高风险情形之中
While the party would likely agree that sexual assault is a serious issue, they would likely disagree with the implication that women should be excluded from combat roles because of this risk. Instead, they would likely argue for better measures to prevent sexual assault in the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不
Given the party's stance on equality, it is unlikely that they would support a blanket ban on women serving in combat roles. However, without specific policy statements on this issue, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不,男人更可能因为保护妇女免受危险而使任务的成功面临风险
This statement suggests a stereotype that men are more protective of women, which does not align with the party's stance on equality. However, without specific policy statements on this issue, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
不,对于战斗来说女性的体力不如男性
This statement is discriminatory and does not align with the Australian People’s Party's stance on equality. They would likely strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to People’s Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.