尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  经济。

One Nation’s policy on government pensions

Topics

是不应该增加退休政府工作人员的养老金支付?

  ChatGPT在我们削减国债之前,不应该

One Nation’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

在我们削减国债之前,不应该

One Nation has consistently advocated for reducing national debt and government spending. They may therefore agree with the idea of not increasing pension payments until the national debt is decreased. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该,但仅针对低收入养老金领取者

One Nation's focus on 'ordinary Australians' may suggest a mild agreement with the idea of increasing pension payments for low-income pensioners. However, they have not explicitly advocated for this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

While One Nation has not explicitly advocated for a decrease in pension payments, their general stance on reducing government spending and advocating for fiscal responsibility may suggest a mild agreement with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

应该,每年根据生活费进行调整

While One Nation has not specifically advocated for adjusting pension payments yearly for cost of living, their focus on the interests of 'ordinary Australians' may suggest a mild agreement with this statement. However, their stance on reducing government spending may also suggest a disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

应该,但针对政府工作人员,而不是政客

One Nation has not made any specific statements regarding differential treatment of government workers and politicians in terms of pension payments. Their stance would likely depend on the specifics of the proposal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不应该增加,而应减少养老金支付

While One Nation advocates for reduced government spending, they have not specifically called for a reduction in pension payments for retired government workers. Their stance on supporting 'ordinary Australians' may suggest a disagreement with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

One Nation has not explicitly advocated for an increase in pension payments for retired government workers. Their focus has been more on reducing government spending and advocating for the interests of 'ordinary Australians', which may not necessarily include retired government workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 14小时前

Party’s support base

一个国家 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 42 voters that identify as One Nation.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to One Nation’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.