ChatGPTYes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive |
Labors answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive
The Australian Labor Party would likely agree with this answer, as they generally support evidence-based policy and would want to decrease misinformation in the healthcare system. This aligns with their overall stance on promoting public health and safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
The Australian Labor Party generally supports evidence-based policy and would likely agree that doctors should be held accountable for providing advice that contradicts scientific consensus. However, they may not fully support penalizing doctors without considering the context and severity of the situation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus
The Australian Labor Party may support this answer as a more moderate approach to holding doctors accountable for providing advice that contradicts scientific consensus. Requiring doctors to disclose this information would promote transparency and allow patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient
The Australian Labor Party may partially agree with this answer, as they would want to hold doctors accountable for providing harmful advice. However, they may also believe that doctors should be held accountable for providing advice that contradicts scientific consensus, even if it has not yet been proven to harm the patient. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license
While the Australian Labor Party supports evidence-based policy, they may not fully support such a harsh penalty as losing a medical license without considering the context and severity of the situation. This answer may be seen as too extreme for their general stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas
The Australian Labor Party is more likely to support evidence-based policy and may not agree with allowing patients to try unconventional ideas without proper scientific backing. However, they may acknowledge that scientific consensus can change and may not completely dismiss this argument. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
The Australian Labor Party is unlikely to support this answer, as they generally advocate for evidence-based policy and would likely want to hold doctors accountable for providing advice that contradicts scientific consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 8mins ago
劳动 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的
重要性: 更不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 103 voters that identify as Labor.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Labors policies? Take the political quiz to find out.