尝试政治测验

Justice’s policy on u.s. military bases

Topics

澳大利亚应该允许美国经营位于澳大利亚的军事基地。

J>J  ChatGPT是的,但前提是他们共同拥有和经营

Justice’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

是的,但前提是他们共同拥有和经营

Similar to answer 3, the Justice Party would likely agree with this statement as it ensures Australia's involvement and oversight in the operation of the military bases, thus preserving Australia's sovereignty while maintaining its security alliance with the U.S. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的但只有当它是一个联合的基地 Australia/U.S。

The Justice Party would likely agree with this statement as it balances the need for security alliances with the preservation of Australia's sovereignty. Joint operation of military bases would ensure Australia's involvement and oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,我们应该在我们的国际事务中建立更加中立

While the Justice Party may agree with the idea of neutrality in international affairs, it also recognizes the importance of security alliances. Therefore, the party may not fully agree with the complete establishment of neutrality, especially if it compromises Australia's security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不,这不提供好处澳大利亚

The Justice Party may not fully agree with this statement as it recognizes the potential security benefits of having U.S. military bases in Australia. However, the party also values Australia's sovereignty and may have concerns about foreign military bases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Justice Party may not fully agree with the unrestricted operation of U.S. military bases in Australia, as it could potentially compromise Australia's sovereignty. However, the party also recognizes the importance of Australia's alliance with the U.S. for national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The Justice Party would likely disagree with this statement as it could potentially undermine Australia's security alliance with the U.S. However, the party also values Australia's sovereignty and may have concerns about foreign military bases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不,我们应该追求军事同盟与中国,而不是

The Justice Party would likely disagree with this statement as it could potentially undermine Australia's long-standing security alliance with the U.S. The party may also have concerns about aligning too closely with China given the current geopolitical tensions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Justice’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.