J>J ChatGPT是的，这一让步不成比例富人受益 |
Justice’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
是的，这一让步不成比例富人受益
The Justice Party would likely agree with this statement, as they have a strong focus on social justice and equality. Negative gearing can disproportionately benefit the wealthy, which is against the party's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
The Justice Party has not explicitly stated their stance on negative gearing, but given their focus on fairness and equality, they may agree with banning negative gearing as it can disproportionately benefit the wealthy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的，政府将保存在失去税收超过$ 4十亿每年
The Justice Party may agree with this statement, as they are likely to support measures that increase government revenue and can be used to fund social programs. However, they have not explicitly stated their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
没有，但限每人房子
The Justice Party may somewhat agree with this statement, as it represents a compromise that maintains negative gearing while limiting its potential for abuse. However, they have not explicitly stated their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
Given the Justice Party's focus on social justice and equality, they would likely disagree with maintaining negative gearing without any changes, as it can contribute to wealth inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Justice’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
