J>J ChatGPT不,重点靠结束偷漏税来替代 |
Justice’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
不,重点靠结束偷漏税来替代
The Justice Party strongly supports measures to end tax evasion, especially by wealthy individuals and corporations. They believe this is a fair way to fund public services and reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
不,增加对富人的税收来替代
The Justice Party supports progressive taxation and has advocated for higher taxes on the wealthy. They believe this is a fair way to fund public services and reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
不,削减公共开支将对经济产生不利的影响
The Justice Party is likely to agree with this statement, as they believe that cuts to public spending can harm the economy, especially if they affect essential services or vulnerable populations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
不,应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收
The Justice Party supports progressive taxation and has advocated for corporations to pay their fair share of taxes. They believe this is a fair way to fund public services and reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不
The Justice Party is generally against cuts to public spending, especially if they affect social services or justice-related issues. They believe in a strong public sector and social safety net. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的,还有增加税收
While the Justice Party supports progressive taxation, they are generally against cuts to public spending. They might agree to some cuts if they are targeted and do not affect essential services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
不,换成减少军事费用。
The Justice Party has not specifically advocated for reducing military spending. However, they may support this if it does not compromise national security and the savings are used for social services or justice-related issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
中性
是,但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资
The Justice Party has not specifically advocated for reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials. Their stance would likely depend on the specifics of the proposal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
不,减少政府官员的数量来替代
The Justice Party supports a strong public sector and is unlikely to support reducing the number of government officials, especially if it affects essential services or justice-related issues. However, they may support this if it leads to greater efficiency and does not compromise services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的
The Justice Party generally supports maintaining or increasing public spending, especially on social services and justice-related issues. However, they may agree to some cuts if they are targeted and do not affect essential services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是,而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构
The Justice Party supports a strong public sector and is unlikely to support eliminating federal agencies, especially if they provide essential services or address justice-related issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 13hrs前
司法 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不
重要性: 最不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 31 voters that identify as Justice.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Justice’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.