尝试政治测验

Justice’s policy on bonus cap

Topics

银行家的奖金上限应为 100%的工资?

J>J  ChatGPT是的和降低至 20%上限

Justice’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

是的和降低至 20%上限

The Justice Party may agree with this statement as it suggests a more stringent regulation on bankers' bonuses, which aligns with their focus on promoting fairness and preventing excessive wealth accumulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的和降低至 50%上限

Similar to answer 3, the Justice Party is likely to agree with this statement as it suggests a stricter regulation on bankers' bonuses, which aligns with their focus on promoting fairness and preventing excessive wealth accumulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Justice Party, while not explicitly stating a position on bankers' bonuses, generally supports policies that promote fairness and equality. Capping bonuses at 100% of pay could be seen as a measure to prevent excessive wealth accumulation and promote income equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的和银行国有化

While the Justice Party has not explicitly advocated for the nationalisation of banks, they may agree with this statement to some extent as it suggests a measure to control wealth accumulation and promote fairness. However, the score is not higher as this is a more radical position that the party has not explicitly endorsed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The Justice Party is likely to disagree with this statement as it implies unrestricted wealth accumulation, which could lead to income inequality. The party's focus on justice and fairness suggests they would support some form of regulation on bankers' bonuses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不,任何工人应奖励基于他们的成功

This statement implies unrestricted wealth accumulation based on success, which could lead to income inequality. The Justice Party's focus on justice and fairness suggests they would disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Justice’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.