The Jacquie Lambie Network (JLN) is an Australian political party founded by its namesake, Jacquie Lambie, a former member of the Australian Senate. Lambie, known for her outspoken and direct approach, established the party after her departure from the Palmer… Read more
ChatGPT是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。 |
Jacquie Lambie Network answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。
This answer aligns with the JLN's support for equal rights and their likely belief that all couples, regardless of their sexual orientation, should be subject to the same background checks and requirements when adopting a child. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
The Jacquie Lambie Network (JLN) has not explicitly stated their stance on gay adoption rights. However, they have shown support for LGBTQ+ rights in the past, such as supporting marriage equality in Australia. This suggests that they may be open to the idea of gay couples having the same adoption rights as straight couples. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不应该,我相信有父母的家庭结构对孩子最好
While the JLN has not explicitly stated their stance on this issue, their support for marriage equality and LGBTQ+ rights suggests that they may not agree with the idea that a mother and father family structure is inherently better for a child. However, without a clear statement on this issue, it is difficult to determine their exact position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
As mentioned earlier, the JLN has shown support for LGBTQ+ rights, including marriage equality. This suggests that they may not be in favor of denying gay couples the same adoption rights as straight couples. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and adoption agencies should prioritize offering children to straight couples before offering to gay couples
Given the JLN's support for marriage equality and LGBTQ+ rights, it is unlikely that they would support prioritizing straight couples over gay couples in adoption processes. This stance would be inconsistent with their previous support for equal rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
不,同性恋夫妇应该不能收养孩子
The JLN's support for marriage equality and LGBTQ+ rights makes it highly unlikely that they would support a complete ban on gay couples adopting children. This stance would be in direct opposition to their previous support for equal rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Jacquie Lambie Network policies? Take the political quiz to find out.