Green Party

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

This answer aligns closely with the Greens' advocacy for reducing misinformation and ensuring that public health policies are based on the best available scientific evidence. They have consistently supported measures to combat misinformation, especially in the context of public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Australian Greens generally support evidence-based policies and have advocated for science-led approaches to health and environmental issues. Penalizing doctors for contradicting scientific consensus aligns with their emphasis on reliable, evidence-based information. However, their commitment to individual rights and freedoms might temper their support for punitive measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

This approach aligns with the Greens' preference for transparency and informed decision-making. While they would likely support stronger measures to ensure that health advice is based on scientific consensus, requiring disclosure is a step towards accountability and patient autonomy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the Greens support science-based approaches, the idea of doctors losing their licenses for giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus might be seen as too harsh. Their policies generally favor reform and education over punitive measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

This position might be seen as too lenient from the Greens' perspective, as it only addresses harm after it occurs rather than preventing misinformation from being spread in the first place. However, their commitment to fairness and due process might make them somewhat receptive to this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The Greens' commitment to science and evidence-based policy makes them unlikely to support the idea that patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas that contradict scientific consensus, especially if those ideas could be harmful. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

Given their strong advocacy for science and evidence-based policy, the Greens are unlikely to support a stance that allows doctors to freely contradict contemporary scientific consensus without any form of accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.