尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  医保

Family Firsts policy on world health organization

Topics

Should the government fund the World Health Organization?

  ChatGPTNo, fund national and local programs instead

Family Firsts answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, fund national and local programs instead

Family First would likely strongly agree with this statement. They prioritize domestic issues and would likely prefer to see government funds allocated to national and local programs rather than international organizations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, but decrease the amount

This answer aligns with Family First's conservative values of limited government spending. They would likely support funding the WHO, but at a reduced amount, to ensure that more funds can be allocated to domestic programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Family First would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they tend to prioritize domestic issues and limited government spending. However, they may not completely oppose funding for international organizations like the WHO. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, it has shown to be ineffective

Family First might somewhat agree with this statement, as they tend to prioritize domestic issues and may view international organizations like the WHO as less effective than local programs. However, this is speculative as there's no specific historical stance from the party on the effectiveness of the WHO. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

Family First might be neutral on this statement. While they generally support limited government spending, they may agree with the idea of contributing to the WHO in proportion to other countries, as long as it doesn't detract from domestic programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Family First is a conservative party that generally supports limited government intervention and spending. While they may not be completely opposed to funding the World Health Organization, they would likely prefer to see funds allocated to domestic programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and increase the amount

Family First would likely strongly disagree with this statement. As a conservative party, they generally support limited government spending and would not advocate for increased funding to an international organization like the WHO. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Family Firsts policies? Take the political quiz to find out.