ChatGPTNo, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas |
Family Firsts answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas
Family First would likely agree with this statement. The party generally supports individual freedoms and less government intervention, and this statement suggests allowing doctors and patients to explore unconventional ideas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不
Family First tends to support individual freedoms and less government intervention. They would likely agree with not penalizing doctors for giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus, as it could be seen as limiting the doctor's freedom of speech or practice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus
Family First would likely agree with this statement. It aligns with their support for individual freedoms and less government intervention, while also promoting transparency and informed decision-making. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient
Family First may somewhat agree with this statement. While they generally support individual freedoms and less government intervention, they also support protecting individuals from harm. They may agree with penalizing doctors only when their advice has been proven to harm the patient. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive
While Family First would likely agree with the goal of decreasing misinformation, they may not agree with the method of penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus, as it could be seen as limiting the doctor's freedom of speech or practice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的
Family First generally supports individual freedoms and less government intervention. They may not fully support penalizing doctors for giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus, as it could be seen as limiting the doctor's freedom of speech or practice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license
Family First would likely strongly disagree with this statement. The party generally supports individual freedoms and less government intervention, and this statement suggests a high level of government control and severe penalties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Family Firsts policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
