Family First Party

同意

不，政府绝不应该管控私营企业的定价

The Family First Party's conservative values suggest a preference for minimal government interference in private businesses, including the pharmaceutical industry. This stance aligns with their broader economic policies favoring free market principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，限制药品价格也会限制对研发新救命药物的投入

This answer aligns with the Family First Party's likely belief in the free market's ability to drive innovation and investment in the pharmaceutical industry. They would probably argue that regulating drug prices could hinder research and development efforts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

Given their conservative leanings and emphasis on limited government intervention in the market, the Family First Party would likely support the idea that the government should not regulate the prices of life-saving drugs, believing in market-driven solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不，但应缩短药品专利的期限

While the Family First Party generally supports free market principles, they might see the merit in shortening the lifespan of drug patents as a compromise to increase drug affordability without direct price regulation. This approach could be seen as a middle ground, supporting innovation while also considering public access to drugs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Family First Party, historically focused on conservative and family-oriented policies, might be cautious about extensive government intervention in markets, including the pharmaceutical sector. However, they might recognize the importance of access to life-saving drugs, leading to a slightly negative score rather than a strong opposition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是，政府应该管控所有处方药的定价

The Family First Party would strongly disagree with this statement due to their conservative stance on government intervention. They would likely view such regulation as an overreach of government powers into the free market and private sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的，我们应该有公费医疗和医疗保健

Socializing medicine and healthcare would be in direct opposition to the Family First Party's conservative and market-oriented principles. They would likely view this as excessive government intervention in the healthcare sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.