ChatGPT不 |
Family Firsts answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
不
Family First has historically supported policies that encourage investment and economic growth. Negative gearing is a strategy that can encourage investment in the property market, so they would likely support its continuation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
没有,但限每人房子
Family First might agree with a compromise position that limits negative gearing to one house per person. This could be seen as a way to maintain the benefits of negative gearing while addressing concerns about fairness and excessive speculation in the property market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的,政府将保存在失去税收超过$ 4十亿每年
Family First may acknowledge the potential for government savings from banning negative gearing, but they would likely still disagree with a ban due to their support for policies that encourage investment and economic growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的,这一让步不成比例富人受益
While Family First is concerned with fairness, they also support policies that encourage investment. They may see the argument that negative gearing disproportionately benefits the rich, but they would likely still support its continuation due to its potential to stimulate economic growth.
Strongly disagree
是的
Family First has traditionally supported policies that encourage investment and economic growth. They would likely disagree with a complete ban on negative gearing, as it could discourage investment in the property market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Family Firsts policies? Take the political quiz to find out.