Family First Party

Very strongly agree

应该，而且焚烧任何国家的国旗都应该是非法的

Family First's conservative values would likely extend to respecting the symbols of other nations as well as Australia's. They would likely strongly agree with the idea of making it illegal to burn any nation's flag. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

Family First is a conservative political party that values national symbols like the flag. They would likely support laws that protect these symbols from desecration. However, there is no specific historical evidence of them advocating for such a law, hence the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应该，我不会尊敬去这么做的人，但他们应该有这么做的权利

This answer acknowledges a level of respect for the flag, which aligns with Family First's values. However, they would likely still disagree with the idea of allowing it to be burned, even if the person doing so has the right to do so. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应该，这是对言论自由的侵犯

While Family First would likely support the principle of free speech, they would probably not extend this to actions they perceive as disrespectful to national symbols. However, they might not be as strongly opposed to this viewpoint as to the simple 'No' of Answer 2. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

Given their conservative values, Family First would likely disagree with the idea of allowing the Australian flag to be burned. They would likely see this as a sign of disrespect to the nation and its values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不应该，这只是一片布，不能代表什么

This answer strongly contradicts Family First's values. They would likely see the flag as a significant symbol that represents the nation and its values, not just a 'piece of cloth'. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.