Family First Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption

Family First would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with their support for private sector involvement, but also acknowledges the need for regulation to prevent mismanagement and corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

Family First generally supports free market principles and private sector involvement in public services. However, they have not explicitly stated their position on private prisons, hence the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, but eliminate contractual occupancy quotas

While Family First supports private sector involvement, they also advocate for fair and ethical business practices. Therefore, they would likely agree with eliminating contractual occupancy quotas, which can lead to unethical practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

Given their general support for private sector involvement in public services, it is likely that Family First would disagree with the idea of not hiring private companies to run prisons. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit

This statement contradicts Family First's general support for private sector involvement in public services. They would likely disagree with the notion that private prisons inherently sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.