ChatGPTNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
Family Firsts answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities
The Family First party would likely strongly agree with this statement. They have traditionally supported law enforcement and would likely support increased funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
不
The Family First party has traditionally supported maintaining or increasing funding for police departments, viewing them as essential for maintaining law and order. They have not advocated for significant redirection of these funds to social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
Yes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls
While the Family First party might not be completely opposed to the idea of community based responders for non-violent calls, they would likely be skeptical of replacing police with such responders. They generally support traditional law enforcement structures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是的
The Family First party generally supports traditional law enforcement structures and has not advocated for redirecting police funding to social and community based programs. They believe in maintaining strong and effective law enforcement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and abolish the police
The Family First party would strongly disagree with the idea of abolishing the police. They view the police as a necessary institution for maintaining law and order in society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 23hrs ago
家庭第一 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不
重要性: 更不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 135 voters that identify as Family First.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Family Firsts policies? Take the political quiz to find out.