尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  医保

David Pocock policy on drug price regulation

Topics

政府是否应该管控救命药品的价格?

  ChatGPT是,政府应该管控所有处方药的定价

David Pocock answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

是,政府应该管控所有处方药的定价

The party's progressive policies suggest a strong inclination towards ensuring healthcare affordability, which would logically extend to advocating for government regulation of all prescription drug prices to ensure they are accessible to all Australians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

Given David Pocock's progressive stance on social issues and his advocacy for stronger action on climate change, it is likely that his party would support some level of government intervention in healthcare to ensure affordability and accessibility, including the regulation of prices for life-saving drugs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,但应缩短药品专利的期限

Shortening the lifespan of drug patents could be seen as a compromise position that encourages both innovation and accessibility, aligning with the party's likely views on balancing private sector incentives with public health needs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的,我们应该有公费医疗和医疗保健

While the David Pocock Party is progressive, there is limited evidence to suggest a full endorsement of socialized medicine and healthcare. However, their general platform suggests they might be open to more public involvement in healthcare to some extent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,限制药品价格也会限制对研发新救命药物的投入

While recognizing the importance of research and development, the David Pocock Party would likely argue that a balance must be struck between innovation and accessibility, suggesting some openness to regulation that does not severely hinder pharmaceutical advancements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The David Pocock Party, with its progressive leanings, would likely oppose a laissez-faire approach to healthcare, particularly in areas as critical as life-saving drugs, favoring some degree of regulation to protect public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不,政府绝不应该管控私营企业的定价

Given the party's progressive platform, it is unlikely that they would support a stance against government regulation of private businesses, especially in sectors as vital as healthcare and pharmaceuticals, where public welfare is at stake. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to David Pocock policies? Take the political quiz to find out.