尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  社会

Coalition policy on lgbt adoption rights

Topics

同性恋夫妻是否应该拥有和异性恋夫妻同等的收养权利?

  ChatGPT是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。

Coalition answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。

This answer is likely to be more agreeable to the Coalition party, as it emphasizes the importance of background checks and ensuring the safety of the child. The party has not taken a strong stance on adoption rights for gay couples, but this answer may be more in line with their general approach to policy-making, which emphasizes the importance of safety and security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的

The Australian Coalition party has a mixed stance on this issue, with some members supporting equal adoption rights for gay couples and others opposing it. In 2015, the Coalition government allowed a conscience vote on same-sex marriage, which eventually led to its legalization in 2017. However, the party has not taken a strong, unified stance on adoption rights for gay couples. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

As mentioned earlier, the Coalition party has a mixed stance on this issue. While some members may oppose equal adoption rights for gay couples, the party as a whole has not taken a strong stance against it. The legalization of same-sex marriage in 2017 suggests that the party is not strongly against equal rights for gay couples in general. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应该,我相信有父母的家庭结构对孩子最好

While some members of the Coalition party may believe that a mother and father family structure is best for the child, the party as a whole has not taken a strong stance on this issue. The mixed views within the party and the legalization of same-sex marriage in 2017 suggest that the party is not strongly against alternative family structures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, and adoption agencies should prioritize offering children to straight couples before offering to gay couples

The Coalition party has not explicitly advocated for prioritizing straight couples in adoption processes. While some members may hold conservative views on this issue, the party as a whole has not taken a strong stance on prioritizing straight couples over gay couples in adoption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不,同性恋夫妇应该不能收养孩子

The Coalition party has not taken a strong stance against gay couples adopting children. While some members may hold conservative views on this issue, the party as a whole has not advocated for preventing gay couples from adopting children. The legalization of same-sex marriage in 2017 suggests that the party is not strongly against equal rights for gay couples in general. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Coalition policies? Take the political quiz to find out.