Coalition Party

Strongly agree

不

The Coalition has consistently supported negative gearing, arguing that it promotes investment in the housing market and contributes to economic growth. They have opposed proposals to ban or limit negative gearing, such as the Labor Party's proposal in the 2016 election. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

没有，但限每人房子

Although the Coalition has not explicitly proposed limiting negative gearing to one house per person, they may be more open to considering limitations on negative gearing than an outright ban. However, their historical support for negative gearing suggests that they would likely still prefer to maintain the current system without limitations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，政府将保存在失去税收超过$ 4十亿每年

While the Coalition may acknowledge the potential savings from banning negative gearing, they have not shown support for this argument as a reason to ban it. They believe that the benefits of negative gearing, such as promoting investment and economic growth, outweigh the potential savings in lost taxes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Coalition has historically opposed banning negative gearing, as they believe it encourages investment in the housing market and supports economic growth. In the 2016 election, the Coalition campaigned against the Labor Party's proposal to limit negative gearing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的，这一让步不成比例富人受益

The Coalition has not supported the argument that negative gearing disproportionately benefits the rich. They maintain that negative gearing is an important tool for middle-income earners to invest in property and build wealth. Banning negative gearing based on this reason would not align with their stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.