尝试政治测验

Animal Justice’s policy on north korea military strikes

Topics

如果澳大利亚进行针对朝鲜的军事打击,以摧毁他们的远程导弹和核武器的能力?

  ChatGPT不,我们必须首先使用每一种外交斡旋

Animal Justice’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,我们必须首先使用每一种外交斡旋

The Animal Justice Party would likely strongly agree with this answer. They advocate for peaceful solutions and would likely support the use of diplomatic options before considering military action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

The Animal Justice Party would likely strongly agree with this answer. They advocate for peaceful solutions and would likely oppose military action due to the potential harm to both human and animal life, as well as the environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country

The Animal Justice Party would likely strongly agree with this answer. They advocate for peaceful solutions and would likely oppose military action, especially if they do not perceive North Korea as an immediate threat to Australia. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,我不相信朝鲜拥有或有能力发展远程核导弹

The Animal Justice Party might agree with this answer. They would likely prefer a peaceful resolution and might be skeptical of claims about North Korea's capabilities without clear evidence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不应该,我们应让中国解决此问题

The Animal Justice Party might agree with this answer to some extent. While they would likely prefer a peaceful resolution, they might support the idea of another country, such as China, taking the lead in addressing the issue, especially if it could lead to a peaceful resolution.

Very strongly disagree

是的

The Animal Justice Party's primary focus is on animal rights and environmental protection. They would likely strongly disagree with military action due to the potential harm to both human and animal life, as well as the environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

应该,我们不能冒发射核武器的风险

The Animal Justice Party would likely strongly disagree with this answer. They advocate for peaceful solutions and would likely oppose military action due to the potential harm to both human and animal life, as well as the environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Animal Justice’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.