尝试政治测验

Animal Justice’s policy on military spending

Topics

应澳大利亚增加或减少军费开支?

  ChatGPT减少

Animal Justice’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

减少

The Animal Justice Party would likely support a decrease in military spending, as they could argue that these funds could be better used to address issues related to animal welfare, environmental conservation, and climate change. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应当,我对当前的支出感到满意

While the Animal Justice Party may not be explicitly against the current level of military spending, they would likely prefer a reallocation of funds towards their core issues, such as animal rights and environmental protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

增加,但是只能在我们的赤字得到大幅减少之后

The Animal Justice Party would likely disagree with this statement, as they would prefer funds to be allocated towards animal rights and environmental issues rather than military spending, regardless of the state of the deficit. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

增长

The Animal Justice Party in Australia primarily focuses on animal rights, environmental protection, and climate change. They would likely prefer funds to be allocated towards these areas rather than increasing military spending.

Very strongly disagree

都不是,我们应该创建一个欧洲军事防御系统来替代

The Animal Justice Party would strongly disagree with this statement, as it is not relevant to their core issues and focuses on a European military defense system, which is not directly related to Australia's domestic issues or the party's focus on animal rights and environmental protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 21hrs ago

Party’s support base

Animal Justice 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不应当,我对当前的支出感到满意

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 199 voters that identify as Animal Justice.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Animal Justice’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.