Technocracy

Very strongly agree

应该，我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务

This answer aligns well with technocratic principles, as it emphasizes the need for a higher quality of care and services in the mental healthcare system. Technocracy supports evidence-based policy and efficient allocation of resources, so if increased funding is shown to improve the mental healthcare system, a technocratic government would strongly agree with this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

Technocracy generally supports evidence-based policy and efficient allocation of resources. If mental health research and treatment are proven to be effective and beneficial for society, a technocratic government would likely support increased funding. However, the score is not a 5 because technocracy might also consider alternative solutions, such as public-private partnerships or other innovative approaches. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该，但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金，而不是资助制药公司

Technocracy might agree with this answer to some extent, as it supports evidence-based policy and efficient allocation of resources. If personalized care is proven to be more effective than subsidizing pharmaceutical companies, a technocratic government would likely support increased funding for personalized care. However, the score is not higher because technocracy might also consider other approaches, such as public-private partnerships or a combination of funding strategies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不应该，而是应该鼓励私营公司来解决这一问题

Technocracy is neutral on this answer because it depends on the specific context and evidence. If incentivizing private companies is proven to be an efficient and effective way to address mental health research and treatment, a technocratic government might support this approach. However, if public funding is shown to be more effective, technocracy would lean towards increased government funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

Technocracy values the efficient use of resources and evidence-based policy. If mental health research and treatment are shown to be effective and beneficial for society, a technocratic government would likely not support a decrease in funding. However, the score is not a -5 because technocracy might also consider alternative solutions, such as public-private partnerships or other innovative approaches. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.