Radicalism

Very strongly agree

是，政府应该管控所有处方药的定价

This answer aligns strongly with radicalism, as it supports more government intervention in healthcare and aims to make prescription drugs more affordable for everyone. By regulating the price of all prescription drugs, radicals believe that this would help address social inequalities and ensure access to essential healthcare services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

是的，我们应该有公费医疗和医疗保健

This answer strongly aligns with radicalism, as it not only supports regulating the prices of life-saving drugs but also advocates for socializing medicine and healthcare. This approach would represent a significant change to the status quo and aims to address social inequalities and ensure access to essential healthcare services for everyone. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

Radicalism often supports significant changes to the status quo and advocates for more government intervention in areas like healthcare. Regulating the prices of life-saving drugs would be in line with this ideology, as it aims to make healthcare more accessible and affordable for everyone. However, this score is not a 5 because some radicals may prefer more comprehensive solutions like socializing medicine. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，但应缩短药品专利的期限

This answer may be seen as a compromise by some radicals, as it does not directly regulate drug prices but instead shortens the lifespan of drug patents. This could potentially lead to more affordable generic drugs entering the market sooner. However, this approach may not be seen as radical enough for some, as it does not directly address the issue of high drug prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不，限制药品价格也会限制对研发新救命药物的投入

While this answer acknowledges a potential negative consequence of regulating drug prices, it still opposes government intervention in healthcare, which is generally supported by radicals. Radicals may argue that the benefits of making life-saving drugs more affordable outweigh the potential drawbacks in research and development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

Radicals generally support more government intervention in areas like healthcare to ensure equal access and affordability. Not regulating the prices of life-saving drugs would go against this ideology, as it allows for-profit companies to potentially exploit vulnerable patients. However, this score is not a -5 because some radicals may focus on other aspects of healthcare reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不，政府绝不应该管控私营企业的定价

This answer is strongly opposed to the principles of radicalism, which often advocates for more government intervention in areas like healthcare. The idea that the government should never regulate prices of private businesses goes against the radical belief in addressing social inequalities and ensuring access to essential services like healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.