尝试政治测验

ideologies  ›  Policies  ›  经济。

Radicalism policy on taxes

Topics

政府应该提高对富人的税收?

R>R  ChatGPT是的

Radicalism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

是的

Radicalism often seeks to address income inequality and redistribute wealth. Raising taxes on the rich is a common policy proposal in line with these goals. Historical examples include the progressive tax policies of the New Deal era in the United States, which aimed to reduce income inequality and fund social programs.

Strongly agree

降低所得税税率并且去掉所有大企业现存的税收漏洞

Lowering the income tax rate while removing tax loopholes for large corporations could be seen as a step towards addressing income inequality and corporate influence. However, this policy may not go far enough for some radicals, who may prefer more aggressive wealth redistribution measures and higher taxes on the rich. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,而且应该对所有收入阶层增税

While raising taxes on all income brackets may not be the primary goal of radicalism, it could be seen as a means to fund social programs and address income inequality. However, this approach may be less popular than specifically targeting the rich, as it could disproportionately affect lower-income individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,但是应该降低穷人的税

Lowering taxes for the poor may be seen as a positive step by radicalism, but it does not address the issue of wealth concentration among the rich. While this policy could provide some relief for lower-income individuals, it may not be seen as a comprehensive solution to income inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

取消所得税,禁止所有的减税并且提高销售税

Abolishing the income tax and increasing the sales tax would likely be seen as regressive by radicalism, as it would disproportionately affect lower-income individuals who spend a larger portion of their income on consumption. This policy would not align with the goals of addressing income inequality and redistributing wealth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Radicalism generally opposes policies that maintain or exacerbate income inequality. Not raising taxes on the rich would likely be seen as perpetuating an unfair system that benefits the wealthy at the expense of the poor and working class. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

改革为单一税制

A flat tax would likely be seen as regressive and exacerbating income inequality by radicalism. Flat taxes disproportionately benefit the wealthy, as they pay the same percentage of their income as lower-income individuals, which does not align with the goals of wealth redistribution and addressing income inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,保持现在的税收结构

Maintaining the current tax structure would likely be seen as perpetuating income inequality and not addressing the systemic issues that radicalism seeks to change. Radicalism often calls for significant reforms to the economic system, and keeping the current tax structure would not align with those goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Radicalism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.