保护主义

同意

No, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit

Protectionism may agree with this answer, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of private prisons, such as sacrificing quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit. This concern aligns with protectionist values of protecting citizens and domestic industries. However, protectionism does not inherently oppose all private involvement in industries, so the score is not strongly in favor of this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

Protectionism may lean towards government control of certain industries, including prisons, to ensure the well-being of citizens and maintain domestic jobs. However, protectionism does not inherently oppose private involvement in all sectors, so the score is not strongly in favor of this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption

This answer represents a middle ground that allows for private involvement in prisons while also ensuring government oversight. Protectionism may be somewhat in favor of this approach, as it can protect domestic jobs and maintain some level of control over the industry. However, the focus on regulation may not be a primary concern for protectionism, so the score is not strongly in favor of this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

Yes, but eliminate contractual occupancy quotas

This answer focuses on eliminating contractual occupancy quotas, which is not a primary concern for protectionism. While protectionism may be concerned with the potential exploitation of prisoners for profit, this answer does not address the broader issues of private involvement in prisons or government control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Protectionism generally focuses on protecting domestic industries and jobs. While private prisons could create jobs, the potential for exploitation and prioritizing profit over rehabilitation may not align with protectionist values. However, this answer does not completely oppose private prisons, so the score is not at the extreme. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.