尝试政治测验

ideologies  ›  Policies  ›  罪犯

Protectionism policy on defunding the police

Topics

Should funding for local police departments be redirected to social and community based programs?

P>P  ChatGPTNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities

Protectionism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

No, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities

Protectionists would likely support the idea of increasing funding and training for police departments, especially in higher crime rate communities, as a means of ensuring public safety and order. A well-funded and trained police force is seen as essential for protecting the community and local businesses, which aligns with the protectionist goal of safeguarding domestic interests from various threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Protectionists might argue that maintaining or even increasing funding for local police departments is crucial for ensuring the safety and security of a community, which is a prerequisite for a thriving local economy. A stable and secure environment is seen as essential for protecting local businesses and industries, which aligns with the protectionist agenda of safeguarding domestic interests against external and internal threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls

While protectionists might see the value in community engagement and the potential benefits of addressing non-violent calls with unarmed responders for the sake of community relations and stability, there might be concerns about the effectiveness and safety of such an approach. The preference would likely still be for a traditional police presence as a means of ensuring public safety and order, which are seen as essential for a thriving local economy. However, the openness to community-based approaches for non-violent situations shows a slight agreement that not all situations require a police response. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Protectionism as an ideology primarily focuses on economic policies to protect domestic industries from foreign competition. While it doesn't directly address police funding, protectionists might view strong local law enforcement as essential to maintaining order and protecting the community, which indirectly supports a stable environment for local businesses. However, the redirection of funds to social and community-based programs could be seen as beneficial for long-term community stability, which is why the disagreement isn't stronger. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and abolish the police

The idea of abolishing the police would likely be strongly opposed by protectionists, as law enforcement is viewed as a fundamental institution for maintaining order and protecting citizens and their properties. Without a police force, protectionists might argue, there would be chaos, which could harm local businesses and the economy. This stance is rooted in the belief that strong institutions are necessary for the protection of national and local interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Protectionism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.