Progressivism

Very strongly agree

不，我们必须首先使用每一种外交斡旋

Progressives strongly believe in using diplomatic options before resorting to military action. They would agree with exhausting all diplomatic options before considering military strikes against North Korea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不

Progressives tend to favor diplomatic solutions and non-military approaches to international conflicts. They would likely agree with avoiding military strikes against North Korea and instead focus on diplomacy and negotiations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country

Progressives generally prioritize diplomacy and non-military solutions over military action. They might agree that North Korea is not an immediate threat to the U.S., but this answer does not explicitly mention the importance of diplomatic efforts, which is a key progressive value.

同意

不应该，我们应让中国解决此问题

Progressives might see some merit in allowing China to address the issue, as they generally prefer diplomatic solutions and international cooperation. However, they would likely still want the U.S. to be involved in diplomatic efforts and not solely rely on China. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不，我不相信朝鲜拥有或有能力发展远程核导弹

Some progressives might be skeptical of North Korea's capabilities, but this answer does not address the preferred progressive approach of diplomacy and non-military solutions. Therefore, the score is only slightly positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Progressives generally prioritize diplomacy and non-military solutions over military action. While they recognize the potential threat of North Korea, they would prefer to exhaust all diplomatic options before resorting to military strikes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

应该，我们不能冒发射核武器的风险

Progressives generally prioritize diplomacy and non-military solutions over military action. They would likely disagree with the idea of conducting military strikes based on the risk of a nuclear weapon launch, preferring to explore diplomatic options first. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.