尝试政治测验

ideologies  ›  Policies  ›  医保

National Conservatism policy on medical consensus

Topics

Should medical boards penalize doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus?

NC>NC  ChatGPTNo, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

National Conservatism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

This answer best aligns with national conservative principles by allowing doctors to share their professional judgment, even if it contradicts consensus, while also ensuring transparency and informed decision-making for patients, respecting both freedom of speech and patient safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

This answer aligns with the national conservative value of skepticism towards centralized authority and a preference for individual choice and freedom, including in medical treatments and opinions, even when they go against the mainstream. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

This ideology might lean towards supporting the freedom of doctors to express and practice according to their professional judgment, even if it contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, as a matter of principle on freedom of speech and skepticism of centralized control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

National Conservatism might find this approach more acceptable, as it balances the protection of patients from harm with the preservation of doctors' freedom to offer alternative advice, provided it does not result in proven harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

While reducing misinformation is a goal that national conservatives might share, the method of penalizing doctors for contradicting scientific consensus could be seen as too authoritarian and an infringement on free speech and medical autonomy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

National Conservatism often emphasizes the importance of individual freedoms and skepticism towards centralized authorities, including in the realm of scientific consensus. They might not fully support penalizing doctors for dissenting views, seeing it as an infringement on free speech and medical autonomy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

National Conservatism, valuing individual freedoms and autonomy, would likely strongly disagree with such severe punitive measures against doctors for contradicting scientific consensus, viewing it as an excessive infringement on personal liberties and professional judgment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to National Conservatism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.