尝试政治测验

Limited Government policy on abortion

Topics

你对人工流产的看法是什么?

LG>LG  ChatGPT反对堕胎,但是如果是强奸、乱伦或者对母亲和孩子有危险则应该允许

Limited Government answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

反对堕胎,但是如果是强奸、乱伦或者对母亲和孩子有危险则应该允许

This stance aligns more closely with limited government ideology, as it allows for some personal freedom while still maintaining a level of government protection for the unborn. It acknowledges that there are certain circumstances where government intervention may be necessary to protect the rights and well-being of individuals involved. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

反对人工流产

Limited government ideology generally supports minimal government intervention in people's lives. While some proponents may lean towards pro-life, it is not a core tenet of the ideology. However, limited government supporters may argue that protecting life is a fundamental role of the government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

堕胎权合法,我不同意但是政府没有权利禁止

This stance acknowledges personal disagreement with abortion but emphasizes the limited role of government in people's lives, which is consistent with limited government ideology. However, it does not address the potential responsibility of the government to protect the unborn, which may be a concern for some limited government supporters. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

反对堕胎,我还反对强奸和乱伦的受害者堕胎

This stance is strongly pro-life, which may resonate with some limited government supporters who believe that protecting life is a fundamental role of the government. However, it does not align with the broader principle of minimal government intervention in personal decisions, making it less agreeable for those who prioritize individual freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

主张自由选择,但禁止在怀孕三个月后堕胎

This stance is a compromise between pro-life and pro-choice positions, which may appeal to some limited government supporters. However, it still involves government intervention in personal decisions and does not fully align with the core principles of limited government ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

支持人工流产

Pro-choice stance generally advocates for more personal freedom and less government intervention, which aligns with limited government principles. However, some limited government supporters may argue that the government has a responsibility to protect the unborn, making this stance less agreeable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

主张堕胎合法,提供节育、性教育以及更多社会服务能帮助减少堕胎数量

While the pro-choice stance may align with limited government principles in terms of personal freedom, the additional measures mentioned (providing birth control, sex education, and more social services) involve increased government intervention and spending, which goes against the core tenets of limited government ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Limited Government issues? Take the political quiz to find out.